On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 at 19:17, Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

>
>     > Yes, I guess you could call it an ephemeral cache entry
>     > constructed by CoAP at JP when the join response is received,
>     > before being forwarded to the pledge. As soon as the packet is
>     > passed to L2, the cache entry is removed. Can we do this?
>
> I think that we can do this.
>
> It might be better if the traffic came from ff02::2, but I'm not sure that
> would be acceptable for IPv6 reasons.
> I am concerned that a reply from a different L3 address will not be
> acceptable to some coap libraries.



Indeed, good point about a different adress in the response.

@Pascal, would it be possible for JP to use all-routers as the source IPv6
address? If not, does it help if we define our own well-known address?
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
6tisch@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to