Georgios Z. Papadopoulos <georgios.papadopou...@imt-atlantique.fr> wrote:
> Many thanks for this work. Going through the draft, I have a
> comment/question :
> Considering that “The containing Enhanced Beacon is not encrypted.”
> (Section 3), is it necessary to include “rank priority” at L2 and,
> thus, revealing this information?
I consider it a concern as well.
When returning from a deep sleep, where there may be multiple
LLNs on different PANIDs (and in 6tisch, with different schedules, even using
different sets of channels), there is a desire to know which network will
"closer".
I think that we need to understand the tradeoffs, so let's discuss
(also in the ROLL WG!). Perhaps a compromise is that the rank priority can
be forced to maximum value on networks that want to keep the information
private.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list 6tisch@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
