On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 07:06:59AM -0400, Russ Cox wrote: > > The "global" plan9 one (sda1) seem to be the same in both cases, as well > > as the other sda* ones (linux), but the subpartitions (not sure they're > > called that way) inside differ. > > I suppose the correct one is the plan9 one, i.e 9fat should start at the > > beginning of the plan9 one (at 63), and not at 0, right? Hence the reason > > why everything has an offset of 63 inside the plan9 part, I guess. > > > > So, what should I do? Is it a bug in 9vx, or is it something wrong in my > > partitions that I have to correct? > > Notice that you've lost your data partition > and you don't have a geometry line. > That suggests you are running 0.12, > which does not contain Erik's bug fix. > If you rebuild 9vx from hg I think things will > work better.
Indeed, works like a charm with the build from hg. Thanks. Mathieu.
