On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Eris Discordia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/clms]# ls -l `which vim` > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1221212 Oct 15 2006 /usr/local/bin/vim > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71>dir gvim.exe > Volume in drive C has no label. > Volume Serial Number is B001-B4A3 > > Directory of C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71 > > 05/12/2007 12:19 PM 1,585,152 gvim.exe > 1 File(s) 1,585,152 bytes > 0 Dir(s) 5,075,197,952 bytes free > > C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71>dir vim.exe > Volume in drive C has no label. > Volume Serial Number is B001-B4A3 > > Directory of C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71 > > 05/12/2007 12:14 PM 1,372,160 vim.exe > 1 File(s) 1,372,160 bytes > 0 Dir(s) 5,075,197,952 bytes free > > C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > So what? (and the two latter were _Windows_ binaries). > >> I realize that is utterly unfair. Sort of. > > Nice of you to realize that. Sort of. >
yes, I agree, I was being terribly unfair to plan 9. Acme on plan 9 is about 1/2 M. Vim on DOS is 3x larger? impressive. Ron
