On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:15 AM, ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Eris Discordia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/clms]# ls -l `which vim` > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1221212 Oct 15 2006 /usr/local/bin/vim > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71>dir gvim.exe > > Volume in drive C has no label. > > Volume Serial Number is B001-B4A3 > > > > Directory of C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71 > > > > 05/12/2007 12:19 PM 1,585,152 gvim.exe > > 1 File(s) 1,585,152 bytes > > 0 Dir(s) 5,075,197,952 bytes free > > > > C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71>dir vim.exe > > Volume in drive C has no label. > > Volume Serial Number is B001-B4A3 > > > > Directory of C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71 > > > > 05/12/2007 12:14 PM 1,372,160 vim.exe > > 1 File(s) 1,372,160 bytes > > 0 Dir(s) 5,075,197,952 bytes free > > > > C:\Program Files (x86)\Vim\vim71> > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > So what? (and the two latter were _Windows_ binaries). > > > >> I realize that is utterly unfair. Sort of. > > > > Nice of you to realize that. Sort of. > > > > yes, I agree, I was being terribly unfair to plan 9. Acme on plan 9 is > about 1/2 M. Vim on DOS is 3x larger? impressive. > > Ron > > How much of that is library support code to make it work? :-)
