On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Brantley Coile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That explains why IBM's MVS didn't have locking at all. One would conclude > from that fact that locking isn't required to do even serious business > applications. >
I don't follow your reasoning. Saying fcntl locking is not useful does not mean you don't need locking, just that you don't need fcntl. By the way, can you (forsyth) expand on why you couldn't use it/didn't work for you?. -- - curiosity sKilled the cat
