On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:17 -0500, erik quanstrom wrote: > i think we can skip the sematic arguments and the questions > about rooting. let's go directly to how would you unify > the big-n Namespace in a way that's clearly better?
At this point: I don't know. :-( The discussion was tremendously useful for me, though. I can only hope it was also moderately entertaining for the rest of the list. Thanks, Roman.
