>From earlier in this thread:
"Sam and Acme use a simple, pure form of regular expressions. If they
had the counting operations, this would be a trivial task, but to add
them would open the door to the enormous, ill-conceived complexity of
(no longer) regular expressions as the open source community thinks of
them."
So, if you want counting, you can always write a patch, who knows, it
might even be accepted.
But I think that anyone not under the influence of psychedelic
substances that has suffered PCR, will agree we don't want to move in
that direction, and even if small, counting is a step in that
direction.
I personally rarely have use for it, and when I do, it is trivial to
write a script to generate the desired regexp, and I'm eternally
grateful for being free from Perl-induced psychosis.
uriel
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.syk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/3/4 Rob Pike <robp...@gmail.com>:
>> Not all the features adapt as easily.
>>
>> -rob
>
> By counted repetittion I've always meant just the mentioned, i.e.
> {n}
> {n,}
> {,m}
> {n,m}
> .
> What feature do you have on mind?
>
> Thanks
> Ruda
>
>
