> Give or take that all the executables fail, I have enough MINGW > binutils from the NetBSD package to convince me that MINGW can be > built and no doubt some debugging will soon take care of the stumbling > blocks. > > It is true that debugging is going to be hard without symbol > information (one more good reason to go the ELF route for my GCC > model, in my opinion) and that I need a real implementation of the > SEEK syscall before I start on the debugging, but these are > surmountable obstacles. I guess you need to keep holding thumbs. >
Sorry, this went completely over my head. It sounds like you have achieved somthing impressive but I'am afraid I don't understand. -Steve
