Uriel here's an honest question, would you stop complaining if you had your own account on the murray hill version of plan9 will full access to the venti? You'd also have the freedom to do whatever you want with it.
Yes or no. On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Uriel <urie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Something that is totally unreliable, no matter how cool, is not very useful. > > And I think anyone that has limited time, and who wants to get > something done, will pick "very reliable but totally shit" over "very > unreliable but very cool" every single time. > > Also there is little reason for Plan 9 servers to be unreliable, > others with very little resources have managed to run public Plan 9 > servers in their spare time that have proved to be much more reliable > than sources. > > Peace > > uriel > > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:52 PM, <dav...@mac.com> wrote: >>> You may think it's a question of money (you mentioned it is for free). >>> It's not. There are many projects out, totally for free, but reliable. >>> When I do something it must be reliable, or it's worth criticizing. >> >> Firstly if sources goes down, no-one dies so it's not a big deal. >> >> Secondly, given the choice between "a bit unreliable but very cool" >> and "very reliable but totally shit", I know which I will take. >> >> D > >
