you say > I think, Google did not choose Plan 9 due lack of device drivers, poor > IPv6 support and confusing redundant fragment of code lurking around in > /sys/boot or 9load, but a compared with Linux a compact, clean and > much more efficient FreeBSD could definitely have been a better choice.
but then > But that's [linux] still a huge hog and spaghetti code; needs a lot of > cleanup, > which I don't think is going to happen in the near future. i think you're going to have to pick a lane. and having fought with both the linux and plan 9 boot process, i can assure you that the plan 9 boot process is simplier and more straightfoward. /sys/boot is trivial compared to a linux initrd. - erik
