On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Roman V. Shaposhnik <r...@sun.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 09:27 +0100, Robert Raschke wrote: > > > Last time I tried, the standard Lua compiled out of the box under the > > APE. > > That is good to know. Still, I'd rather see it run without APE. > > > Great little language. I use it in my day job (together with Erlang). > > *together* with Erlang?!?! That I have to know more about. Perhaps > off-list. > > > It's implementation is indeed just as enlightening as the Plan 9 > > code. An exercise in doing exactly what is required and no more. Very > > elegant in my eyes. > > Couldn't agree more! > > Thanks, > Roman. > > >
