On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:09 PM, <lu...@proxima.alt.za> wrote: >> we've got fgb's wonderful program and I think we're crazy if we don't >> build on that. > > A deserved compliment, certainly. Now to figure how to provide the > grouping I believe is required in addition to the means for > replication. And, if I'm not being stupid, some facility to make sure > that the final product has at least some chance of working according > to expectations. Can't expect fgb to deal with that :-) > > ++L >
Wouldn't grouping be a matter of placing a "category" file in the package? I'm reading "grouping" as the kind of divisions you get in Ports, i.e. net, editor, util, language, etc. John -- "Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing" -- Rob Pike