On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:09 PM,  <lu...@proxima.alt.za> wrote:
>> we've got fgb's wonderful program and I think we're crazy if we don't
>> build on that.
>
> A deserved compliment, certainly.  Now to figure how to provide the
> grouping I believe is required in addition to the means for
> replication.  And, if I'm not being stupid, some facility to make sure
> that the final product has at least some chance of working according
> to expectations.  Can't expect fgb to deal with that :-)
>
> ++L
>

Wouldn't grouping be a matter of placing a "category" file in the
package? I'm reading "grouping" as the kind of divisions you get in
Ports, i.e. net, editor, util, language, etc.

John
-- 
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing" -- Rob Pike

Reply via email to