On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen <eri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 4:26 AM, <lu...@proxima.alt.za> wrote: >>> but I can dig >>> them up, clean them up, and share them, >> >> My particular concern is to encourage convergence towards a single >> source distribution rather than divergence as seems to have been the >> case so far with Plan 9 native, Inferno, p9p and now Go. What I have >> chosen to do, ill-advised as it may be, is to set up a mercurial >> repository to re-distribute hacked Go sources that mostly contain >> harmless changes that make it possible to compile the Go sources and >> specifically the development toolchain with the Plan 9 toolchain. I'm >> presently trying to bring the work I did last year into this >> repository and at the same time keep track of the Go release. >> > > I've had a composite repo of previous attempts (well, Sape's previous > attempt) at doing this (for some time) at: > http://code.google.com/p/go-plan9/ > > I'm happy to add anyone to the committer/admin list, although my > preference is to keep the main branch in sync with go and have folks > attempts at conversion in sub-branches. You are of course welcome to > maintain your own repo with your own effort, I just figured if > everyone had a common place to see what approaches people were using > we might get there faster.... > > -eric
Is the porting process active? -rob
