On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 1:07 AM, EBo <e...@sandien.com> wrote: > Does anyone use 9P2000.u anymore? >> Can we just remove it from the p9p tree? >> > > Last summer when I was banging my head against the bug in alloctree I got > it all to work when I removed 9P2000.u and some other stuff from > lib9p/srv.c. At that time I got a comment back that the patches I proposed > would likely not be accepted, in part because I removed the 9P2000.u code... > > If there are no objections to removing 9P2000.u, I can tell you that > migrating p9p's srv.c code back to Plan 9's version does in fact fix the > bugs in Tree. I was simply not sure how many of the changes had to be > reverted to make alloctree work properly. > > > It seems like a good idea to removing .u. I think I can add .u back to some other 9P implementations I have if I want it.
Dave > EBo -- > > >
