Well, since Ron's tree is based on Yiyus', and Ron's doesn't have that patch, I think that means Yiyus' doesn't have it either. And yet, Yiyus' works for me, so I doubt this bug was the culprit for me. More like a 64 bits issue as Yiyus mentionned earlier, no?
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote: > Hello, > > Mathieu Lonjaret wrote: >> >> this last error keeps on repeating. >> as a plan 9 tree I'm using the same old one that I kept using with rsc's >> 9vx (minimal tree provided by rsc, and later filled with more plan 9 >> stuff), could that be the issue? if yes, what do you guys for a tree >> with ron's 9vx? > > the bug is easy to solve [0]. Ron didn't integrate my patch > for this one for a long time, so I started my own repository > of 9vx. > > I tried to solve the problem by resolving all sprint() occur- > ences in the Plan 9 kernel and that way in 9vx too. The patch > wasn't accepted; sprint() needs to be fixed. > > > Sincerely, > > Christoph Lohmann > > [0] > http://git.r-36.net/vx32/commit/?id=d6e5c080a23fcb914b740db48573305f3712eba0 > >
