So any more thoughts on whether or not this would be useful? I have to revise: that I did point to a java sdk and really should have constrained my contents to something like jquery api instead.
So- why? (why build a website of drawterm) (I think) I like plan9 as a potential network controller. Not sure if I have the right idea or not. It is 'experimental,' after all. Having a full blown web interface to acme.dump and the things it can do to read and respond to routers of all varieties seems like it could be kind of useful. But I could be misguided, uninformed and tired. And StyxBrowser seems to lack auth code of any kind, and doesn't connect, or make any useful complaints that I can find right now. Oh it connects to the ip/port that it ships with, and is a file browser not a drawterm port, but that was in the docs. Yeah I would much rather run from (from within, or away from) an ajax app anyway. much happyness all, hroyerboat misguided, uninformed and tired. On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:15 AM, dorin bumbu <bumbudo...@gmail.com> wrote: > it seems somebody already done a js virtual machine :) > > http://linux.slashdot.org/story/11/05/17/0242244/Boot-Linux-In-Your-Browser > > Dorin > > > > on the other hand, i think a js virtual machine (mips would be nicer > > than x86) might be interesting. drawterm has always been a clever > > hack. it would be nice to have emulated environment that's more > > portable than 9vx and not tied to 32-bit x86. > > > > one would then be able to write applications for non-plan 9 users > > in plan 9. clearly they will have a browser. > > > > not that i'm signing up or anything. :-) > > > > - erik > > > > > > -- ⎼⎺⎺├@┼␊├├≤-␍⎼␊▒␍:/⎺└␊/⎼⎺#
