If it wasn't for this cancerous web applications ordeal, I would be happy with OpenBSD & rio, and maybe with pure Plan 9 in the future ..
Simon On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis <eeke...@fastmail.fm>wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 21:17:14 +0200 > simon softnet <ph.soft...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Because it's more likely that users will settle with linux+some plan 9 > > features > > instead of with pure plan 9 > > Most of us have to anyway. > > For now... > > > > > Simon > > > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:12 PM, David Leimbach <leim...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > I don't see why anyone combining ideas from Plan 9 into Linux hurts > > > Plan 9 as long as Plan 9 continues to exist. > > > > > > On Saturday, July 16, 2011, simon softnet <ph.soft...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Please, don't let plan 9 and linux be interrelated in the future in > any > > > way ...Future plan 9 users have the opportunity to experience novel > > > user-space paradigms.Why do they have to be sucked into the linux > world? > > > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Robert Seaton <seat...@dupage.edu> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> one might find http://www.glendix.org/ project interesting > > > > > > > > The project actually already uses a glendix patched kernel and much > of > > > > my upcoming work will be focused on porting more of Plan 9's syscalls > > > > to the Linux kernel so that more native Plan 9 apps can be run on > > > > Linux. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
