On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros <n...@lsub.org> wrote: > +1 for using parallel mkfiles.
as I say, I liked this too, but it fails the zero changes rule. But we'll let the guys doing the work make the rules. First one to produce a useable Go tree wins -- if, that is, they make updates from the mainline go tree easy. Be aware that no go tree I know of passes the Go test suite, yet. Lots of fun ahead. Anthony, you do know that there is a mk based version of Go that builds, right? ron
