http://www.chunder.com/text/dead.html
On 20 March 2012 19:25, Paschke Christoph <c.pasc...@me.com> wrote: > In 3 weeks I need work together with Italians because of a machine control > and the optimization system behind. > It's already difficult to work together and you can imagine English is > already a good way communication works. > Although, in real, it is still difficult to understand the italian english > and probably same with me that the italians understand my german english. > French and Swiss boarders are just some km away ... This multinational mix is > a problem in EU. > > And this not only means the language, it also means so much other things. For > example, the culture differences and problems with history. > So, I remember some years ago, I had to work together with polish people at a > project. I speak russian and therefore I starting to speak with them russian > what they can understand very well. They told me: What you speak russian to > us, we not living in soviet union anymore. And I answered: You can speak > German? NO! What you expect me to speak english, we not living in USA the > same. And such is ONLY an example of the intercultural problems because for > example the polish people living historically between the hate to russians > and the hate to the germans. And if you need work together such way, can be > very exhausting and many projects fails. > > But this is ONLY another example. It becomes also with knowledge very > confusing. So, you cannot expect to have one standard to work on. One do such > way, other do other way. One knows this way, other knows other way. EU is > like the babel tower. And I think that other QUITE homogenous nations like > USA cannot understand that chaos. > > If you buy all you need from your own's company's nation like in former times > this is no problem. > But if nations working together in such "small scale" as it becomes now more > and more reality, it is difficult in many cases. > > And in this way, I already get the feeling that the EU-project behind the > Mini-X is a trial to a machine-control-fundamental that can be quite unique > over Europe once a day. > How much this is real, how much this will be, who knows? Maybe if Mini-X > evolves, the governmental offers of EU will dictate Mini-X as the standard > that need be fulfilled. I think in US it was similar procedure with Ada > programing language and military hardware etc. > > I can imagine this is the background of the Mini-X project. Why not Linux? > Probably because it is already to much chaos and you cannot come back to the > fundamentals anymore that you can expect each nation in EU to get learned, > understood ... Coming back to a structured base that also is planed to get > teached in schools is maybe the way to solve this problem. > > But what I speak about Mini-X so much in Plan 9 forum? I got lost a little > bit in thoughts about it because of the GSoC and EU support for it. So, in > real we speak about Plan 9 here, I know! Therefore last part from me about > that comparative issue. Nobody knows how things will come. If people would > know, probably Plan 9 would be the follower of Unix, but it didn't come that > way! > > Am 20.03.2012 um 00:24 schrieb Bruce Ellis: > >> Even Shaney is having trouble with these fish of the trees, tho he >> would like to borrow "Most cases EU does central shit". >> >> brucee >> >> On 20 March 2012 10:07, Charles Forsyth <charles.fors...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/gadgets/plug-versus-plug-49303764/ >>> >>> >>> On 19 March 2012 22:22, andrey mirtchovski <mirtchov...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> damn electric sockets! *shakes fist of impotent rage* >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Don't meddle in the mouth -- MVS (0416935147, +1-513-3BRUCEE) >> > > -- Don't meddle in the mouth -- MVS (0416935147, +1-513-3BRUCEE)
