On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 02:53:21 +0100
Connor Lane Smith <c...@lubutu.com> wrote:

> On 3 June 2012 02:40, Stephen Wiley <swwi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > One thing that I can see is that the 40 billion windows you open are all
> > grouped together and don't get in your way when using other apps. (One of
> > the things I like about osx is that it does that with all the apps)
> >
> > Though I guess you could script rio to group things with similar labels
> > together...
> 
> I remember reading this being cited as one of the reasons why sam's
> "windows within a window" flayer approach is preferred amongst long
> time users. In my opinion, if the window manager is having difficulty
> managing windows, it isn't doing a very good job. Instead of resorting
> to handling windowing within each and every application, we ought to
> treat the source of the problem. That may be by making rio group
> similar labels, but I'm inclined to think that a "canal" -- a tiling
> window manager, effectively -- would be a better approach in the long
> run.

And I'm thinking of nested window managers of differing types according
to the user's choice. I guess I didn't make that clear, judging by this
and all the following posts in this subthread. ;)

-- 
This is obviously some strange usage of the 
word "simple" that I was previously unaware of.

Reply via email to