> I saw your CL, but I think your description is a bit too concise, I > can't quite get my mind around it. Has anyone consulted with Bell > Labs and tried to convince them to add Bgetle* and Bputle* in libbio, > yet? I have a feeling that a clean patch (I'm sure I have one handy)
lucho, as explained before we think this is a *BAD* idea. macros are generally avoided. especially long complicated ones like those. > PS: Why the hell is there no Bgetbe* and Bputbe*? because it's just a micro speed hack for the compiler. i don't think they're thinking of maintaining libbio as a system library. there are reasons not to use this as libbio. - erik
