At Mon, 06 Jan 2014 19:25:29 +0100, Nicolas Bercher wrote: > > On 05/01/2014 19:09, Shane Morris wrote: > > "Plan 9 Inside"?
I was trying to suggest `recursion' on one level, and perhaps `expanding development' on another---though `nine inside' is a clever angle. > No, it's just Plan 9 inside 9 inside 9 inside 9 inside 9. (-; > > Nicolas Nine 9s would have been symbolically better, but it cannot be made to work graphically unless the scale is enormous. At screen resolution the centre just becomes blurred. I had to settle for six nines (three positive, three negative). Peter
