> Yes, I typed them by hand. Sorry about the error.
> 
> >> panic: kernel fault: no user process pc=0xf0162415 addr=0x000000a8
> >> panic: kernel fault: no user process pc=0xf0162415 addr=0x000000a8
> >
> > there is a new TEST image @ http://ftp.9atom.org/other/+usbinstamd64.bz2
> > i have not had a chance to try it myself, but the crash seems obvious 
> > enough.
> 
> Thanks. I just tried it and indeed, with the pae kernel, it gets me
> into the installer. At some point, I mistakenly selected ("arches to
> install" as amd64, well I really wanted to install amd64 but perhaps
> the kernel has not been rebuilt for amd64 I guess.
> 
> Now, it proceeds to "build full set of amd64 executables?" which I
> selected "yes". I then get a build error:
> 
> 8c -FTVw s_tolower.c
> s_rdinstack.c:13 not a function
> s_rdinstack.c:13 syntax error, last name: Sinstack
> mk: 8c -FTVw s_rdinstack.c  : exit status=rc 594: 8c 604: error
> mk: date for (i  ...  : exit status=rc 509: rc 563: mk 565: error
> halt system? (yes, no, skip)[no default]

oops.  sorry.  my fault.  fixed.

> I am going to try installing a 386 system instead (after sending out
> this email).
> 
> Also the amd64 kernel still didn't boot. When I selected amd64
> (selection 0), it just printed something that I couldn't read and
> rebooted the system.

if this is an amd (not intel) system, i may have applied a band-aid for this.

> Very eager to try these out. If you have any new builds and want to
> test them out (and can bear the time zone difference -- I am in
> GMT+5.30), I will be glad to test them out.

everything is ready to try in

        http://ftp.9atom.org/other/+usbinstamd64.bz2

this is the test image.

- erik

Reply via email to