> On 9 Oct 2018, at 14:08, Digby R.S. Tarvin <digby...@gmail.com> wrote:

<…>

> So I don't think it i would be worth a substantial rewrite to get it going. 
> It is a shame that there don't seem to have been any more powerful machines 
> with a comparably elegant architecture and attractive front panel :)
> 
> An attractive front panel for nearly any machine is just a soldering iron, 
> LEDs and some logic chips away. As far as elegant architectures, some are 
> very nice: MIPS is kind of retro but elegant, RISC-V is nice, 680x0 machines 
> can be had a reasonable prices, and POWER is kind of cool. I know I 
> shouldn't, but I have a soft spot for ARM.
> 
> I have thought about it, but there are a couple of problems (in addition to 
> my lack artistic talent when it comes to building physically attractive 
> enclosures)..  One is the sheer number of LEDs required to display all of the 
> address and data lines in a modern architecture.  Mainly an issue if I want 
> to use the old PDP11/70 front panel that I had saved for the purpose, I 
> suppose. The other problem is getting access to the all of the machine state 
> that was displayable on a mini computer console. Virtual addresses, 
> User/Kernel mode, register contents etc are all hard to get at. I have toyed 
> with using JTAG etc, but there always seems to be something that I can't get 
> to. So it is hard to do more than resort to a software controlled front 
> panel. I used to have a little box of LEDs and switches that I plugged into 
> the parallel port on PCs, and had my BSDi kernel modified to update it as 
> part of the clock interrupt. But now the parallel ports are becoming rare and 
> you can't update LEDs connected via USB in a single instruction... :-/

Probably not quite what you’re after, but the PiDP8 and PiDP11 kits will get 
you an (arguably) attractive front panel without requiring artistic talent.

   http://obsolescence.wixsite.com/obsolescence/pidp-11

I’ve not looked into how the front-panel is driven (from SIMH, I guess?), but 
perhaps it could be suitably massaged?



d

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to