> > What I notice - correct me if I am mistaken - is that any comparison between > 9front and 9legacy seems to needle a few members (very few, there are many > names from that community that have not participated, specifically the ones I > know hand have long respectes, ask them) of the 9front community that seem to > take offence unless 9front is painted in a better light. I guess that's > permissible, but please mind your manners if you choose to go that route, > this is 9fans and 9front I believe has its own discussion groups. >
I offer you the perspective that this happens by rule when obviously wrong or ridicolous claims or demands about / of 9front are made. This is seen to further degrade the already quite degraded perspective it has within parts of the 9fans community. I don't think it is unreasonable for people who have invested a lot of effort into 9front and believe it to be something worthwhile to feel the urgency to defend it, or at the very least talk about it. I do think a bit more courtesy or less bad faith assumptions could be prescribed to certain individuals, and not only on the 9front side. Anyway, I propose such issues are best solved by a fist fight, therefore acknowledging the legacy of dispute resolution methods of our ancestors and fostering a more resilient and vibrant community that thrives on both change and tradition. ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tcf128fa955b8aafc-Mb5d3c0ebed77a8c9231bc757 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
