I'm checking with my friends in the HPC space, but, so far, we're a bit surprised to see some pretty old stuff presented as new stuff.
But I'm still asking around. On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 7:49 AM Anthony Sorace <[email protected]> wrote: > This came up on the fediverse ~18 months ago; here’s what I said at the > time: > > “Depends on the workload, of course, but it feels like a very comfortable > fit. Certainly the vast majority of 9p *messages* on a given network are a > small fraction of their “small” threshold. I need to read the paper more > carefully; the RPC oriented design sounds promising, but the “at least > once” model and no explicit ACKs raises some questions for me. > > it would be a fun experiment, for sure! Got a datacenter I can try it on? > ;-)” > > Reading the paper more didn’t really answer the questions, and I still > haven’t found a datacenter to try it on. > > > > On Sep 21, 2026, at 22:48, Skip Tavakkolian <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I will preface this by acknowledging that I know very little about the > > details of the protocol and I could be totally off the mark. > > > > I only recently found out about Ousterhout's latest project from this > > recent talk. Homa protocol is based on the paper referenced below. My > > first impression is that the 9P (RPC) on top of IL seem very similar > > to one of Homa's features -- the receiver-driven congestion control. > > I'm also wondering if a variation of IL could implement these > > features, or if 9P could benefit from use of Homa. Has anyone done > > any deep thinking? > > > > Ousterhout's talk > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZ8WWZzoaR0 > > > > Homa: A Receiver-Driven Low-Latency Transport Protocol Using Network > Priorities > > https://people.csail.mit.edu/alizadeh/papers/homa-sigcomm18.pdf ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Td0379c45387a908c-Mc9645e2d0b7f60fef69c655e Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
