good point. except, dennis was mostly ignored. why should mortals expect different results?
i also don't understand your defence of _Bool. why add a type that behaves in a nonstandard manner? i see two disadvantages with this approach. 1. the compiler must have special rules for a type with irregular rules. 2. programmers must remember these special rules, increasing the chance of error. why would a typedef- or enum-based boolean type fail to serve this purpose, assuming one is convinced of the need for a boolean type. - erik On Fri Apr 27 12:23:36 EDT 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If you guys really care about this stuff, you should participate > in the process, rather than sit on the sidelines and carp about > what others have done.
