On 10/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>
> > * app <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> So, if not X, then how about some higher (or eperhaps lower?) layer
> >> libraries (qtk? Qt? Gecko?) ported so that porting the 10 (or 100)
> >> best known FOSS packages (whatever they are) would become more
> >> possible?
> >
> > Porting libs like gdk to plan9 would be cool.
> >
> > But you shouldn't forget that many libs should be heavily
> > restructured and cleaned up.
> >
> >> How about a project to take something like Firefox and restructure the
> >> whole sw so that best modules would be kept and other modules re-
> >> implemented /dev/draw way and Rio way?
> >
> > Huh, that's an really HUGE plan. I'm a little bit involved
> > in moz and know what I'm talking about ;-O
> >
>
> Why not start with something a bit smaller. ...like making SSH2 work. We
> use plan9 for work a lot and not having SSH2 working is a large hassle.



I just asked about this the other day...  Wondering where it is  :-)

I'm not sure what's left to be done to make it go...


Might even throw some money in the pot for someone to finish that project
> as the crypto application is a bit beyond me.



I think bounties for Open Source projects are neat, until someone decides
not to maintain it :-)

However, they can sometimes get the ball rolling in a way that lets novices
help with maintenance after the "experts" have moved on.

Dave

> --- Marina Brown (tsygry)
>
>
>
> >
> > cu
> > --
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Enrico Weigelt    ==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
> >       http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
> > Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
> >       http://patches.metux.de/
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>

Reply via email to