Sorry. My fault. I meant v4.
On 11/1/07, Eric Van Hensbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/1/07, Francisco J Ballesteros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We did look at nfs v3 and lbfs before implementing op. > > > > nfs v3 at least tried to address latency and not just bandwidth as lbfs, > > but it seemed to use more RPCs than needed for some tasks (I don´t remember > > now, but have that written down somewhere). > > > > IIRC, NFSv4 has more lease negotiation stuff as well as compound operations. > Of course its like a 500 page spec and looks to be more of an example > of what not to do IMHO... > > -eric >
