On Jan 23, 2008 2:13 PM, ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 23, 2008 6:17 AM, Iruata Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 23, 2008 7:35 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > flash doesn't have anything to do with compliance. nor does javascript. > > speaking of the web, you should be compliant with what you choose to > > implement. > > if you only implement html and you're compliant with w3c, you are compliant. > > and, arguably, useless. > > There is spec compliance and de-facto compliance. Or, maybe, spec > compliance and > what people want compliance. > that's true. but it's a little hard to state what is a what-people-want compliance.
> One of the first questions users ask of a new C compiler is "are you > gcc compliant?". > sadly, that's true. iru
