On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Joe <[email protected]> wrote: >> I agree with you that would be a nice feature to have. But I wonder >> if the real issue is the morality and trust of the participants. For >> example, even having that particular feature won't stop the >> accusations from someone who wants to eristically and >> opportunistically abuse it. So I consider that regardless of what >> features were available, it would still come down to a level of trust >> among participants, moderators and group owners. And my private >> consideration is that there is no specific technical feature that can >> ultimately compensate for abusive and divisive group members. > > We're trying not to have any of those, eh? >
I don't think this forum holds an appeal for them ... :( Regards, Brock
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "A Civil Religious Debate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/a-civil-religious-debate?hl=en.
