On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, James Allwright wrote: > It would also be nice to find a written standard to support the > interpreation, since the only definition I can find says nothing about > ties and so implies that the accidental is necessary.
I just took a look at the draft standard, and it doesn't appear to say anything about accidentals remaining in effect until the end of the bar, either. Maybe I'm not looking in the right place. John To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
