John Chambers wrote: > Bert Van Vreckem writes: > | John Chambers wrote: > | > There is a problem applying the GPL to music. The way it's phrased, > | > it really does apply mostly to software. Of course, that was what it > | > was designed for. > | > | For your information, the Electronic Frontier Foundation has developed > | an `open' license for music. Take a look at > | <http://www.eff.org/IP/Open_licenses/eff_oal.html>. > > Thanks for the pointer; I hadn't stumbled across that one > yet. It's well worth reading, and I'd suggest that everyone > here check it out.
Last year, there was a discussion on Slashdot about this license which may also be interesting: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/04/25/1237227&mode=thread&tid=141 http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/09/08/1333226&mode=thread&tid=141 -- Bert Van Vreckem If Bill Gates had a penny for each time Windows crashed... Wait a minute! He does! To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
