ANewman110 writes:
| This looks fine using iabc, except that I think the cleff that you actually
| want is
| an octave lower.
...
| > K:G clef=bass octave=-1

Yet another example of how confusing music terminology can be. Do you
mean  that  you  want a bass clef with a little '8' below?  My abc2ps
clone can do that; it would be written
  K:G clef=bass-8

I suspect that this is not what was meant, but I'm not sure.  Another
guess is that the writer fed the notation to a music player and wants
it to sound an octave lower.  This might be:

  K:G clef=bass octave=-2

Again, I'm not sure.

Now, this is probably an example of "picky, picky, ...", but  we  are
in part dealing with computers here. Those little monsters don't work
very well unless you have very consistent and precise terminology. If
not,  what  you get usually won't be at all what you thought you were
asking for.

One of the interesting discussions I've had since I  foisted  my  abc
tune finder on the world is the question of why I did it at all.  Why
not just use the big search sites?  The answer is that, if you try to
find  music  (that you can put on a music stand and read) on the web,
you find that it is buried in 100 times as much music (that  you  put
in your machine and sound comes out of the speaker). Now, you'd think
that it would be easy to distinguish paper from sound.  But it  turns
out  that  there is no English terminology to clearly distinguish the
two.  People are usually surprised at this, and often  don't  believe
it.   So  I  ask them to suggest keywords, and for each I explain how
they will fail.  If they still don't believe me, I just suggest  "Try
it;  you'll  find  that  it  doesn't  work."  Musical  terminology is
incredibly confused, illogical, and ambiguous.  Computers can't  deal
with it at all well.

Many of the discussions here show a lot of the symptoms of this  same
problem. One of the worst is anything involving "transposition". Just
ask a bunch of musicians  to  explain  transposing  instruments,  and
watch  them  degenerate  to mass confusion as it becomes obvious that
they aren't communicating with each other at all.  (I've done this at
times, and it's really funny to watch.)

In the topic at hand, we see that even the simple case of octaves  is
really too complex for us to communicate clearly.

To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

Reply via email to