On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Diego Sueiro wrote: > I had this problem too ( compiling from cvs ) when > this modification was introduced. Whoever did it ( > haven't checked CVS blame ) prepended the include with > a minus sign, intending, I guess, that make won't fail > if the included file cannot be found. That doesn't > work in my box at all. That was exactly my intent. I guess I shouldn't have assumed that -include would work correctly on all platforms (what platform are you on, anyway?) I'll ifdef-WIN32 it so you guys don't have to worry about it. -Tom
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready to g... Sam TH
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready ... Martin Sevior
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready ... Aaron Lehmann
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready ... Martin Sevior
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready ... Martin Sevior
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready ... Sam TH
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready to go Thomas Fletcher
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready to go Sam TH
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready to go Thomas Fletcher
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready to go Diego Sueiro
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready to go tomabi
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready to g... Diego Sueiro
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready ... Tom Briggs
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready ... Sam TH
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready ... Tom Briggs
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready ... Diego Sueiro
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready ... Tom Briggs
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready to go Dom Lachowicz
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready to go James Montgomerie
- Re: [Release] 0.7.13 is ready to go Dom Lachowicz
