We're finding that our bridge, UTAH_CHPC, is Unreachable according to the venue client. We have verified this locally, from Australia and Kansas. So my question is, if one can successfully ping the bridge manually, why can't the venue client get a successful ping?
Jimmy -- Jimmy Miklavcic Multimedia Specialist [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CTR FOR HIGH PERFORM COMPUTING 155 SOUTH 1452 EAST RM 405 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84112-0190 Office: 801.585.9335 Fax: 801.585.5366 http://www.anotherlanguage.org<http://www.anotherlanguage.org/> _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jimmy Miklavcic Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 9:42 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [AG-TECH] Bridge question. We are running our own bridge, on Red Hat,here at Utah. It runs on the same subnet as my AG system. I activate unicast and select our bridge (UTAH_CHPC) the venue client does not reset the vic and rat as it normally does when I select other bridges. So I force the update by selecting GO. When I do this, usually I will se the IP address of the bridge in the vic and rat windows, but for our bridge, I see a multicast address. So now I'm really confused. Has anyone run into this symptom at all? Could someone test this out from the outside. Our bridge is registered and the IP is 155.101.28.50. Thanks, Jimmy -- Jimmy Miklavcic Multimedia Specialist [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CTR FOR HIGH PERFORM COMPUTING 155 SOUTH 1452 EAST RM 405 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84112-0190 Office: 801.585.9335 Fax: 801.585.5366 http://www.anotherlanguage.org<http://www.anotherlanguage.org/>
<<attachment: Blank Bkgrd.gif>>
