Oho!!
Again copyright issue about even discussion of copyright amendment!!!!
(Smile!)

Anyway, I don't think discussion in this public forum is out-of-bounds as 
something is under consideration of government.
After all, in a democracy, government requires free input even if it asks for 
it or not.

And, expression of opinions even if reaches the eyes and brains of government 
officials, is not going to prejudice and favorable outcome.
Anyway, ultimately moderatorial discretion  would prevail and I would not write 
on this issue, unless permitted.




Regards

"Perhaps our role on this planet is not to worship God-- but to create Him."

                                        --Arthur C. Clarke

(Rajesh Asudani)

Assistant General Manager,
Reserve Bank of India
Nagpur
09420397185
O: 0712 2806676
Res: 0712 2591349



-----Original Message-----
From: accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in 
[mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of Kotian, H P
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 2:15 PM
To: To:
Subject: Re: [AI] regardin copywrite issue

Dear Rahul

Is the material you have reproduced in public domain? I suppose not, as  it is 
still in the consideration of the government. In that case, I suppose it may 
not be right to discuss in a public space like ours.

Harish Kotian.

From: rahul cherian <rahul.cher...@inclusiveplanet.com>
To: raghuraman <thinkdontbl...@gmail.com>,
        accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Subject: Re: [AI] regardin copywrite issue
ear Raghu,

After much campaigning by rights groups and a meeting that we had with Mr.
Kapil Sibal, the HRD Ministry has proposed the following wording for the 
copyright amendment:



*Section 52 (1) (za)**: The reproduction, issue of copies or communication to 
the public of any work in a format, including sign language, specially designed 
only for the use of persons suffering from a visual, aural or other disability 
that prevents their enjoyment of such works in their normal
format.* *

Section 31B (1):** An organization, registered under section 12A of the income 
tax act, 1961 (act 43 of 1961) and working primarily for the benefit of persons 
with disability, and recognized under chapter X of the persons with 
disabilities (equal opportunities, protection of rights and full
participation) act, 1995 (act 1 of 1996) may apply to the Copyright Board, in 
such form as may be prescribed, for a compulsory license to publish any work in 
which copyright subsists for the benefit of such persons, in a case to which 
clause (za) of subsection (1) of section 52 does not apply, and the Copyright 
Board shall dispose of such application within three months.*

*(2) The Copyright Board may, upon receiving an application under subsection
(1) inquire, or direct such inquiry as it necessary, to establish the 
credentials of the applicant and satisfy itself that the application has been 
made in good faith.

(3) If the Copyright Board is satisfied, after giving to the owners of rights 
in the work a reasonable opportunity of being heard and after holding such 
inquiry as it may deem necessary, that a compulsory license needs to be issued 
to make the work available to the disabled, it may direct the Registrar of 
Copyrights to grant to the applicant such a license to publish the work.

(4) Every compulsory license issued under this section shall specify the means 
and format of publication, the period during which the compulsory license may 
be exercised and, in the case of issue of copies, the number of copies that may 
be issued.

Provided that where the Board has issued such a compulsory license, it may on 
further application and after giving reasonable opportunity to the owner of the 
rights, extend the period of such compulsory license and allow the issue of 
more copies as it may deem fit.

(5) The Copyright Board may specify the number of copies that may be published 
without payment of royalty and the fix the rate of royalty for the remaining 
copies.* The abovementioned amendment is flawed for the following reasons:



i.                    *Use of special formats:* The exception extends only
to ?specially designed? formats such as Braille and would really benefit only a 
part of the disabled community. Those affected by dyslexia, cerebral palsy, low 
vision and other physical disabilities and the late blind would require audio, 
reading material with large fonts and electronic texts. As these are not 
formats specially aimed at a disabled group they?re not included in the 
exception. In other words, more than half of India?s disabled would be forced 
to pay royalties to merely access the information that is freely available to 
those persons who can work with special formats.
This violates the guarantee of equality under Article 14 of the Constitution of 
India, since it discriminates between those persons with disabilities who are 
able to work with special formats and those for whom the special formats make 
no sense. Even otherwise, by failing to institute a meaningful copyright 
exception that would enable access to many educational materials by the 
disabled, the State has failed in its duty to guarantee a meaningful right to 
life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.



ii.                  *Provision to extend only to organizations primarily
working in the field of disability: *Even upon payment, compulsory licensing of 
the copyrighted work is permitted only to those organizations working primarily 
for the benefit of the disabled. Not only does this exclude educational 
institutions such as Delhi University, Xavier?s College Mumbai, Loyola College, 
Chennai and many other universities which have resource centres and courses 
especially to cater to the needs of disabled students from carrying on their 
activities, but it shuts out the avenue for disabled persons to turn to other 
sources of getting accessible information, such as self help groups, voluntary 
services run by corporates which undertake such activities as part of their CSR 
initiative, as well as all other local groups who are not primarily 
disabled-oriented from obtaining a license to the work. It also denies disabled 
individuals to directly convert works and access them.



iii.                *Delay and loss of crucial time for students:* It is
quite unacceptable that students may have to lose out on academic years due to 
the expected waiting period for permissions, which would be followed by a 
waiting period for conversion after obtaining permission. At the present this 
has already been happening for years. But if the amendment slashes down the 
already limited resources by disallowing academic institutions and voluntary 
sector from undertaking conversions, then the burden on the organizations would 
be too much for them to successfully manage the timely dissemination of 
accessible books, resulting in a complete collapse of the system. Waiting 
periods, even if for upto two months, would go a long way in slowing down 
progress of children.


Rights groups are working together to see what options are available to change 
the proposed wording so that it addresses the legitimate concerns of persons 
with disabilities.

Best regards,

Rahul Cherian
InclusivePlanet.com

________________________________
Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, 
review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this 
e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this email by error, please notify us by return e-mail or telephone 
and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The Bank accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email.


To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with 
the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
  http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, 
review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this 
e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this email by error,  please notify us by return e-mail or telephone 
and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The Bank accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email.



To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with 
the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
  http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

Reply via email to