Then what should we do now? Prepare the complain letter against him, and send it to prime minister office including president office as well. Do it now... whatever I could do, I'll...
On 7/1/10, Harshvardhan Singh Negi <harshvardhan.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > exactly same happened in my case when I registered a complained against my > employer then Mr dhariyal clearly deny to interpret the PWD act section 42 > he also deny to accept UNCRPD and expert committee recommendation of MSJ. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "akhilesh" <akhil.akhi...@gmail.com> > To: <accessindia@accessindia.org.in> > Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 3:15 PM > Subject: Re: [AI] Pls Advise - Case of Shalini Sethi from Delhi > > > Dear Vashishth sir, > I fully agree that they're handling huge numbers of petitions. but > what would you say, when a girl is exposed to risks, she's being > denied from the hostel facility only due to the fact that the head of > the hostel wanted to satisfy her ill intentions, when the same girl > prays before respected officer to give her the justice and the mr. > Dharial becomes angry and says that I can not call them here and I can > not force them by holding their collar to give you the hostel > facility. > I'm referring to the Delhi University’s same case with which I've met > you in your office. > For the information of others, it was the case in which the aggrieved > female student had no place to live anywhere in delhi and she was > staying one day here and another day there. > It was all informed to the Dy Commissioner and after that he responded this > way. > > Another problem that I noticed that they don’t want to interpret the > provisions of PWD act, and they have a tendency to stick with the same > wording as laid down under the act. > We surely need change and it will happen, and will happen for the better. > > > On 6/30/10, SC Vashishth <subhashvashis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Dear Friends, >> >> To come back to the main discussion, I do agree there are shortcomings in >> the working of the office of CCPD and I find precisely four reasons for >> it: >> >> (a) No full time independent Commissioner >> (b) Lack of staff vis-a-vis number of complaints received per day >> (c) No power to direct, its more of advisory nature, so often respondents >> don't take CCPD seriously and do not reply or appear. >> (d) staff transferred from other ministries/departments on deputation with >> no knowledge of the disability, laws and its practice and how does a court >> work. >> >> Mr. Dhariyal is now an experience hand at the office of CCPD we have our >> own >> interest in retaining him. In fact when we had full time CCPD and two Dy >> Commissioners, (Ms. Sunita Singh, if you remember who looked after the >> court >> work) the work started to roll but Ms. Sunita Singh was recalled soon. >> >> Its less of his fault than of the system that he works in. I am not >> defending the officer, but the sheer number of staff and multiple >> responsibilities that have been handed over to the counted staff is mind >> boggling and the Ministry is least bothered about it for no one is >> agitating. None of us would be able to justice with that pendency number >> with higher expectations of the sector from them. Then gradually when they >> can't handle the sheer number they start prioritizing and take action on >> cases which are urgent in nature, or on which there is likelihood of >> ministry or media or court taking a note of. This further rottens the >> system >> and most cases start dragging for years with no justice seems coming. >> >> Also lot of work that the state commissioners should be doing is falling >> on >> the office of CCPD being the central office and half the time the CCPD >> does >> only post office work - forwarding representations from states to state >> commissioners - ofcourse with handly much action happening on them. >> >> I think the way out is to expand the CCPD office and provide trained staff >> to the office. At least four Dy. Commissioners and one full time CCPD with >> trained staff and fully computerised system of tracking matters. I would >> agree with the idea of having a judge or an advocate experienced in >> disability law & human rights holds this office instead of Babus and NGO >> heads. The Ministry of Social Justice has to seriously take a note of it >> and >> disability sector should lead a strong agitation. >> >> On George's point of removal of employee with disability on ground of >> non-performance, we have got an infamous order from none other than >> Hon'ble >> Supreme Court in the case Union of India Vs. Devendra Kumar Pant, on which >> >> I >> wrote my reflections on my blog: >> http://disabilityrightsthroughcourts.blogspot.com/2009/07/reflections-on-supreme-court-judgement.html >> >> However, before deciding the legality of removing a person with disability >> from job on account of non-performance, I would say, it is necessary to >> look >> at whether the employee was given reasonable accommodation, assistive aids >> and devices required to perform that job and sufficient training. Also >> whether the bad behaviour has been construed because the employee demanded >> such accommodation and support and was not given. >> >> Mere declaring a person useless and charge him with bad behaviour is the >> easiest thing to do which is often done by insensitive employers and >> colleagues.There is an urgent need of guidance to the employers to this >> effect- both in Govt. and in private and also there is an urgent need of >> providing support systems like technology, assistive aids, adaptation and >> reasonable accommodation at the cost of Government to provide equitable >> opportunities to those experiencing disabilities. >> >> regards >> >> Subhash Chandra Vashishth >> Advocate-Disability Rights >> 09811125521 >> Voice your thoughts in the blog to discuss the Rights of persons with >> disability bill at: >> http://www.accessindia.org.in/harish/blog.htm >> >> To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in >> with >> the subject unsubscribe. >> >> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >> please >> visit the list home page at >> >> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> > > > -- > === > Visit my blog at: > freestuff4indians.blogspot.com > Skype ID: > akhil.akhil29 > === > > Voice your thoughts in the blog to discuss the Rights of persons with > disability bill at: > http://www.accessindia.org.in/harish/blog.htm > > To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with > the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Voice your thoughts in the blog to discuss the Rights of persons with > disability bill at: > http://www.accessindia.org.in/harish/blog.htm > > To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with > the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > -- === Visit my blog at: freestuff4indians.blogspot.com Skype ID: akhil.akhil29 === Voice your thoughts in the blog to discuss the Rights of persons with disability bill at: http://www.accessindia.org.in/harish/blog.htm To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
