Hi Jim, Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com> writes:
> define a new claim which says - This token supersedes the token(s) > with CWTID values of "x", "y" and "z". Isn't this the same as token revocation with all its implications? I would prefer strict token ordering combined with a sound revocation mechanism. In both scenarios, you would still have the issue that the client forwards the superseding token/revocation message if it has a benefit from doing so. Grüße Olaf _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
