Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize-16: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, Thanks for this document. Like Eric V, I was slightly surprised to see this defined to use DTLS 1.2 when DTLS 1.3 is on the same telechat, which is obsoleting the DTLS 1.2 RFC. But what is not obvious to me is whether the protocol is allowed to use a later version of DTLS, or whether it is strictly tied to DTLS 1.2 and an updated RFC would be required to use a newer version of DTLS. Either way, possibly a few words to clarify this may be beneficial to readers, but I'll leave it to the author's discretion. Thanks, Rob _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
