Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Deb Cooley <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'd like to hear who is in favor as well.
>> It might be useful to provide something concrete to review... a PR, or
>> a diff, or something.
> Like:
mcr> You want more text than Toerless offered?
mcr> https://github.com/lamps-wg/lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs/pull/59/files
## Update to RFC9148
The updates to EST in this document equally apply when using
CoAP as a transport as described in {{!RFC9148}}.
This document therefore adds the following paragraph after the second paragraph
of {{RFC9148, Section 1}}:
<aside markdown="block">
RFC EDITOR: Please replace THISRFC with the RFC number for this document.
</aside>
```
EST over CoAP as specified in {{!RFC9148}} applies unchanged
to {{!RFC7030}} updated by THISRFC.
Hence, all references to {{RFC7030}} in {{!RFC9148}} are assumed to indicate
{{RFC7030}} updated by THISRFC.
```
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
