I do not object. Updating 9148 seems fine. Ship it!
regards,
Dan.
On 6/27/25 12:38 PM, Deb Cooley wrote:
I don't see any comments except for those who commented above
(Toerless and Ben). Do your coauthors agree?
Deb
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 1:45 PM Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
wrote:
Deb Cooley <[email protected]> wrote:
> crickets? What is the plan?
I don't think its up to me to say it's a good or bad idea.
You asked that we get an endorsement for this text from ACE and ANIMA.
So far, no objections. Do you see rough consensus?
> The PR is ok, except you need to add something to the
abstract to say
> you are updating RFC 9148.
Yes, I will add that to the PR.
+RFC9148 is derived from RFC7030, and it is also updated.
--
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to
escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
