Thanks for the PR! I agree that having an integrity hash is overkill, and we should focus on advising CAs.
That said, the considerations for how CAs track agreements are very much specific to each CA, so I'm hesitant to have MUST-level requirements. If you change it to a SHOULD, then I think we're good to go. On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Niklas Keller <m...@kelunik.com> wrote: > 2015-12-09 19:57 GMT+01:00 Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <j...@eff.org>: >> >> On 12/09/2015 12:56 AM, Niklas Keller wrote: >> > >> > How about just requiring that CAs update the URL on changes? >> > >> I think this is the best, simplest approach. > > > I added a PR: https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/52 > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > Acme@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
