On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Richard Barnes <r...@ipv.sx> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> * For 156, keep nonces
>>
>> I seem to recall also agreeing to close #156, since nonces are not a
>> scarce resource for servers, but I don't see this reflected in the minutes.
>> Any objections to that?
>
> This is my understanding of the discussion in Berlin as well
Ugh, sorry that part of the minutes is a bit of a mess, my
apologies... here's the bit where I neglected to note no objections in
the room to keeping nonces:
----
...
RLB: dininclined to drop nonces and thus not remove replay protection.
DECISION: For 156, keep nonces
EKR: nonces are not a big deal for servers.
...
----
--
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Chief Technologist, Center for Democracy & Technology [https://www.cdt.org]
1401 K ST NW STE 200, Washington DC 20005-3497
e: j...@cdt.org, p: 202.407.8825, pgp: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key
Fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10 1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
Acme@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
