I've posted the minutes here: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-acme
Please review them. At the meeting, we came to consensus on several items, summarized here: * support both old and new 'applications' flow * Add version into protected payload * For issue 157, decided to return 302 * drop Challenge; if we need OOB Challenge, we can add it back later. * verify sig_new(M,sig_old(M)) - Richard will be bringing this up to the list, shortkly * For 156, keep nonces Here's the summary of action items: * Russ to draft a paragraph or couple sentences on replacement key operational considerations (Richard will coordinate with Russ) * Request to the mailing list "hey, if you have a post-v1-WGLC, tell us or this may not exist further!" That last item deserves some more explanation. We expect to enter WG last call before IETF-97 in Seoul in November. If there are items you think we should work on after that, please bring them up here once we enter WGLC; which is to say around September. We might need to re-charter, or we might want to just stay together to handle errata and IETF last call, or we might want to say say we're done and disband. Thanks! -- Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
