On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 02:31:15PM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote: > > J.C. Jones <ietf@insufficient.coffee> wrote: > > Hence, I propose we add an optional field to the ARI response > > structure, "explanationURL", which when populated should be presented > > in any user-visible context (logging, alerting, etc) by the > > ARI-compatible client. It would be up to the Certificate Authority to > > ensure the URL presented appropriately translated information for the > > operator, and the CA _should_ only provide the field if there was > > something exceptional that warranted additional explanation or > > context. > > Sounds good. > > If it's for human consumption, then it might need to be an array or dict, > with per-language versions.
Yes, BCP 18 has a few things to say on this matter. -Ben _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
