http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11049
------- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-09 13:21 ------- Created an attachment (id=16776) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16776&action=view) collect _PRS debug info Kurk, can you try this patch and attach the dmesg log, please? It should apply to 2.6.25 or to a current kernel, so just use whatever's most convenient for you. Zhao, can you elaborate on what is broken in the BIOS? We get the warnings for LP00-LP05, LP07, and LP0B-LP1F, but not for LP06, LP08-LP0A, and LPUS. The AML for all those _CRS methods is essentially the same and looks like this (for LP00): Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized) { Store (0x83, IOPT) Name (RRET, ResourceTemplate () { IRQ (Level, ActiveLow, Shared) {0} }) CreateWordField (RRET, 0x01, RINT) Store (PX00, Local0) If (LEqual (Local0, 0x00)) { Store (0x00, RINT) } Else { ShiftLeft (One, Local0, RINT) } Return (RRET) } I don't see what's broken. You mention that in IOAPIC mode, the link devices won't be used. Is that actually a requirement in the spec somewhere? If it's true that they're never used, I wonder if we can avoid evaluating their _PRS methods completely. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
