http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
------- Comment #43 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-06 13:21 ------- Mark, Let me explain situation from my POV. With this bug we have regression, as you say from 2.6.26. So, the ultimate solution will be to revert all the changes to EC since 2.6.26, and by Linus rules what could be done -- no matter how many machines are fixed by the patch, single regression weighs more. What I am trying to do know is to find small patch which will resolve your regression, while keeping every other bugs still fixed, and there are quite a lot of them. I say small because it is not possible to predict how many machines will be broken by non-trivial patch. In many cases even trivial patch will break something. Thus I say that 500+ lines patch series from Yakui is hopeless. There is no way to find which part of this series removed (or masked) your regression, thus there is no point in evaluating it. Thanks for your understanding, hope you will not mind to test some more patches. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
