Since 4Dv12 will not have the "source-code lifecycle" features that
were hinted/promised from before, I'm working on building my own tools
that I'll need to keep track of 4D code and Active4D files.
Between Subversion and Git, what are your preferences?
Subversion is now old school. Git is ***way*** better.
I already have a working 4D 2004<->git bridge, but to update it for
v11 and bring it to market I will need additional funding. Trust me,
it is a lot of work to do it right, I recommend that you not try to
reinvent this particular wheel.
If enough people want to support it I will be happy to finish it up.
And what tools
do you use to manage them, i.e. submit source files, checkout/in etc.
Windows: tortoise git
Mac: gitx, gitnub
For either, you should look at using github.com as the remote
repository.
Kind regards,
Aparajita
www.aparajitaworld.com
"If you dare to fail, you are bound to succeed."
- Sri Chinmoy | www.srichinmoy.org
_______________________________________________
Active4D-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/mailman/listinfo/active4d-dev
Archives: http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/archive/active4d-dev/
